Etihad A332 near Jakarta on May 4th 2016, turbulence injures 33
Last Update: December 29, 2017 / 16:28:46 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
May 4, 2016
Classification
Accident
Cause
Turbulence
Airline
Etihad Airways
Flight number
EY-474
Departure
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Destination
Jakarta, Indonesia
Aircraft Registration
A6-EYN
Aircraft Type
Airbus A330-200
ICAO Type Designator
A332
The airline confirmed an unexpected severe turbulence caused injuries to 31 passengers. The aircraft sustained damage to the overhead lockers due to the severity of the turbulence encounter.
The aircraft was unable to perform the return flight EY-475, which was cancelled, and is still on the ground in Jakarta about 10 hours after landing.
On May 12th 2016 the French BEA reported based on information by Indonesia's Authorities, that the severe turbulence was encountered about 15 minutes prior to reaching the top of descent resulting in injuries to a number of passengers and cabin crew. The occurrence was rated an accident and is being investigated by Indonesia's NTSC.
On Jul 1st 2016 Indonesia's NTSC released their preliminary report reporting the aircraft encountered sudden turbulence at 06:40Z, about 15 minutes before top of descent, the autopilot disconnected and the first officer (26, CPL, 2,656 hours total, 1,176 hours on type) illuminated the fasten seat belt signs. About 30 seconds later the captain (48, ATPL, 11,280 hours total, 2,337 hours on type), pilot flying, was able to re-engage the autopilot after flight conditions had become stable again. During the turbulence encounter, that lasted for about 23 seconds, the aircraft encountered vertical accelerations between -0.65G and +1.95G, pitch variations between +2 and -5 degrees, vertical speeds between -2500fpm and +2000 fpm and altitude deviations of -350 to +450 feet.
The NTSC reported two cabin crew and 9 passengers received serious injuries, 22 passengers received minor injuries.
On Dec 29th 2017 the NTSC released their final report concluding the probable causes of the accident were:
The aircraft was flying within the turbulence area of the thunderstorm which the turbulence area was not anticipated and no warning provided to the cabin crew and passengers.
The aircraft was flying outside the visible cloud which was within the turbulence area of the thunderstorm.
The turbulence was not anticipated and no warning provided to the cabin crew and passengers.
The NTSC analysed based on the FDR recordings:
- On the longitudinal axis, wide-ranging wind speed values of varying head to tail wind for two to four second intervals were recorded. The speed variation was greater than 10 knots per second with the highest value of 39 knots/second.
- On the lateral axis, wide-ranging wind speed values of 15 knots from the right, and up to 17 knots from the left, were recorded over approximate 1.2 seconds (average 25 knots/second).
- On the vertical axis, wide-ranging upward and downward gusts between 9 knots/second and 39 knots/second, were recorded within a time interval of between one to four seconds.
The FDR data during the turbulence showed:
- The altitude varied between 38,750 and 39,450 feet. The vertical speed fluctuated between -2,500 and +2,000 feet/minute.
- The pitch varied between -5° and +2°.
- The vertical acceleration varied between -0.65 and +1.95 G.
...
Based on the definition, it can be concluded that the aircraft experienced severe turbulence.
With respect to turbulence detection the NTSC analysed:
The Honeywell RDR 4000 radar fitted to the aircraft, is capable of detecting weather based on the reflection of water droplets, and to some extent, turbulence based on the Doppler detection of the movement of water droplets ahead of the aircraft.
The prognosis chart also highlighted the development of cumulonimbus cloud which may have extended above FL470 (47,000 feet) in the vicinity of Sumatera Island, where near to the area when the aircraft encountered turbulence.
The pilots stated that they did not enter any cloud at the time of the turbulence encounter.
Based on the information from the prognosis chart combined with satellite weather image, and the evidence of severe turbulence, it is likely that the aircraft was flying in the vicinity of thunderstorm when it encountered severe turbulence. The exact distance from the cloud could not be determined but statements from the pilots indicate that the aircraft did not enter these clouds. As the weather radar detection is based on the presence of water droplets, the area of turbulence may therefore not have been evident to the pilots however, based on the description of the Airbus FCTM and FAA Advisory Circular, turbulence may occur outside the cumulonimbus cloud and may up to 20 Nm laterally.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
May 4, 2016
Classification
Accident
Cause
Turbulence
Airline
Etihad Airways
Flight number
EY-474
Departure
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Destination
Jakarta, Indonesia
Aircraft Registration
A6-EYN
Aircraft Type
Airbus A330-200
ICAO Type Designator
A332
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Etihad A332 over Iran on Jun 29th 2015, first officer incapacitated after blowing his nose
An Etihad Airbus A330-200, registration A6-EYN performing flight EY-45 from Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) to Dublin (Ireland) with 212 people on…
Etihad A332 enroute on Aug 1st 2016, dropped wing panel
An Etihad Airbus A330-200, registration A6-EYN performing flight EY-27 from Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) to Edinburgh,SC (UK), completed a…
Etihad B789 at Moscow on Dec 3rd 2023, engine vibrations in icing conditions
An Etihad Boeing 787-9, registration A6-BLU performing flight EY-65 from Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) to Moscow Sheremetyevo (Russia), was…
Etihad B789 at Hong Kong on Sep 7th 2019, veered off localizer and descended below safe height on ILS approach
An Etihad Boeing 787-9, registration A6-BLF performing flight EY-834 from Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) to Hong Kong (China) with 168 passengers…
Etihad B773 near Abu Dhabi on Jul 11th 2021, engine shut down in flight
An Etihad Boeing 777-300, registration A6-ETP performing flight EY-245 from Dakha (Bangladesh) to Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), was descending…
Etihad A321 at Bangalore on Apr 2nd 2023, cabin did not pressurize
An Etihad Airbus A321-200, registration A6-AEI performing flight EY-237 from Bangalore (India) to Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), was climbing out…
Etihad A321 near Doha on Jan 29th 2023, engine stall
An Etihad Airbus A321-200, registration A6-AEF performing flight EY-325 from Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates) to Dammam (Saudi Arabia), was enroute…
Newest articles
R'Komor L410 near Moroni on Mar 14th 2024, engine shut down in flight
An R'Komor Let L-410, registration 7Q-PBH performing a flight from Moroni to Anjouan (Comores) with 18 people on board, was climbing out of Moroni…
United B738 near Chicago on Mar 17th 2024, air data indication issue
A United Boeing 737-800, registration N18223 performing flight UA-638 from New York La Guardia,NY to Chicago O'Hare,IL (USA), was descending towards…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways