Link SF34 at Canberra on Mar 25th 2023, cabin did not pressurize
Last Update: August 10, 2023 / 15:05:59 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Mar 25, 2023
Classification
Incident
Cause
Cabin did not pressurize
Airline
Link Airways
Flight number
VA-625
Departure
Canberra, Australia
Destination
Sydney, Australia
Aircraft Registration
VH-VEZ
Aircraft Type
SAAB 340
ICAO Type Designator
SF34
Australia's TSB reported on Mar 31st 2023: "During the pre-flight inspection, the crew identified missing trim from the cabin door. During climb, the aircraft did not pressurise as expected and the crew conducted a precautionary descent. The engineering inspection identified a door seal failure. The investigation is continuing."
On Aug 10th 2023 the ATSB released their final report concluding the probable causes of the incident were:
Contributing factors
- The misidentification of the cabin door seal seat as door trim resulted in the company deferral process being incorrectly applied.
- An additional piece of broken door seal seat was misidentified as the section deferred the previous night. In combination with the previously deferred item, this resulted in degradation of cabin pressurisation during the following flight.
The ATSB analysed:
Application of non-safety of flight defect deferral
Part 42 of Civil Aviation Safety Regulations6 allows continued operation of aircraft with minor defects that are not immediately repairable. The operator’s non-safety of flight defect (NSOFD) deferral process was written and approved in accordance with these regulations.
The application of the NSOFD deferral process was applied by the terminating flight crew and the approving licenced aircraft maintenance engineer based on an incorrect assessment that the defect was to a piece of internal trim with no consequence to aircraft serviceability. While a piece of door cosmetic trim would be considered a deferrable defect, the door seal seat defect adversely affects aircraft airworthiness and is therefore not eligible to be deferred under the NSOFD process.
It is important that the licenced aircraft maintenance engineer accurately identifies a defect and its potential effect on aircraft systems prior to applying a maintenance deferral. In this case the use of photo or video to supplement the phone call between the involved pilot and licenced aircraft maintenance engineer would probably have enabled the engineer to identify the detached components as not eligible for repair deferral. This in turn would have resulted in the aircraft being repaired prior to further flight.
Misidentification of additional defect
The ability to defer defects on aircraft is reliant on the ability to accurately communicate the defect between aircrew and maintenance engineering as well as off going and on coming shifts.
The existence of a second defect was not understood by the on-coming flight crew and was not identified until sometime after the incident flight. The specific level of contribution of each section of broken door seal seat could not be determined, however it is likely that the combined effect of both pieces of broken door seal seat was greater than either individual piece, and resulted in degradation of the aircraft’s pressurisation system.
Maintenance and Inspection notes:
Effective shift turnover depends on three basic elements:
1. The outgoing worker’s ability to understand and communicate important elements of the job or task being turned over to the incoming worker.
2. The incoming worker’s ability to understand and assimilate the information being provided by the outgoing worker.
3. A formalized process for exchanging information between outgoing and incoming workers and a place for such an exchange to take place.
Where the possibility of ambiguity exists, it is important that aircrew and maintenance staff take the necessary steps to clarify the message being communicated. This will assist defect identification generally and, in this instance, would have prevented continued operation of an unserviceable aircraft.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Mar 25, 2023
Classification
Incident
Cause
Cabin did not pressurize
Airline
Link Airways
Flight number
VA-625
Departure
Canberra, Australia
Destination
Sydney, Australia
Aircraft Registration
VH-VEZ
Aircraft Type
SAAB 340
ICAO Type Designator
SF34
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Link SF34 at Sydney on Oct 24th 2022, too low of final ILS approach
A Link Airways Saab 340B on behalf of Virgin Australia, registration VH-VEQ performing flight VA-669 from Canberra,AC to Sydney,NS (Australia), was…
Link SF34 at Canberra on Nov 10th 2022, propeller strap penetrates cabin in flight
A Link Airways Saab 340B on behalf of Virgin Australia, registration VH-VEQ performing flight VA-633 from Canberra,AC to Sydney,NS (Australia), was…
Newest articles
Algerie B738 at Oran on Mar 27th 2024, cracked window
An Air Algerie Boeing 737-800, registration 7T-VJK performing flight AH-1084 from Oran (Algerie) to Paris Charles de Gaulle (France), was enroute at…
Delta BCS3 at Seattle on Mar 27th 2024, brakes failure
A Delta Airlines Bombardies C-Series CS-300, registration N301DU performing flight DL-829 from Anchorage,AK to Seattle,WA (USA), was on final…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways