ACT Airlines A30B at Bagram on Mar 1st 2010, left main gear collapsed on landing
Last Update: September 10, 2014 / 15:20:11 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Mar 1, 2010
Classification
Accident
Airline
ACT Airlines
Aircraft Type
Airbus A300
ICAO Type Designator
A30B
Cracks as result of fatigue caused the fracture of the hinge arm of the left main gear strut.
The cracking most likely occurred as result of corrosion that remained undetected during the last maintenance inspection.
The origin of pitting could not be identified, the investigation however identified deficiencies in the maintenance task conducted during last overhaul of the gear strut.
Incomplete maintenance documentation and tools available during overhaul contributed to the accident.
The BEA reported that the aircraft was on a visual approach to Bagram's runway 21 when the crew lowered the gear but received only two green indications, the gear indication for the left main gear remained unsafe. 5 seconds later the green hydraulic system's pressure and quantity indicators fall to zero. The crew went around and declared emergency. The crew subsequently performed two low approaches to Bagram, tower and observers on the ground all gear appeared to be in position. The crew positioned for landing at minimum speed and managed a safe touch down at 160 KIAS (Vref in full landing configuration) at 1.53G (normal), spoilers deploy, thrust reversers deploy, a deceleration of 0.19G occurs, however, when brakes were applied the left main gear collapsed backwards about 18 seconds after main gear touch down. The aircraft veered left and came to a stop about 2000 meters past the runway threshold. The five crew escaped without difficulty and injuries. The aircraft received substantial damage however.
The aircraft had received maintenance from Turkish Technic based in Istanbul, the company had been fully licensed. The left main gear strut had undergone overhaul in that facility between April 2008 and March 2009.
During a visit in September 2011 with advisors from Airbus and Messier-Bugatti-Dowty the BEA found that the work shop did not use suitable carriers after the removal of the entire strut. The individual parts were distributed on carts and shelves contrary to the maintenance manuals. No magnifier glasses were available although required to perform gear examinations as per maintenance manual. A magnetic particle inspection had not been carried out although required, the monitoring of grain sizes of the blasting charges as well as minitoring of chemicals used in treatment bathes had not been carried.
The BEA found that the procedures laid out by Messier-Bugatti-Dowly are less "intuitive" than the procedures of other manufacturers.
The BEA identified the accident sequence was the second such occurrence, another similiar accident had happened to an Airbus A300B4 in 2001 in the United Arab Emirates, where pitting in the hinge arm of the main gear strut had been missed during maintenance inspections.
The BEA analysed that the hinge arm most likely fractured during gear retraction at the time when torque applied to the hinge arm is at maximum. This disconnected the hinge arm from the bracket. As result, during gear extension, the retract actuator was not able to dampen the gear movement, that driven by free fall created excessive pressure in the gear strut's hydraulic cylinder resulting in the rupture of that cylinder spilling the entire fluid of the green hydraulic system.
The BEA analysed commending the crew: "Lors de l’atterrissage, ffectué le plus prudemment possible par l’équipage, le train a pu rester en position usqu’au début e freinage. Par la suite, les forces en présence ont conduit à son ffaissement." (Upon landing, made possible most prudently by the crew, the left main gear was able to remain in position until the beginning of braking. Subsequently, these forces resulted in the collapse of the gear.)
The BEA analysed that the maintenance documentation's architecture "drawers" rather than chronology requires expertise to convert the maintenance documentation into work cards. This could lead to misunderstanding, wrong sequencing of steps or even omission of steps.
The gear strut showed a poor quality of cadmium plating which most likely was the result of poor sanding due to lack of monitoring of the grain sizes as well as inadequate chemical bathes that should have applied the cadmium plating to the parts.
As immediate safety actions taken as result of the accident Turkish Technic reviewed and improved their maintenance procedures together with Messier-Bugatti-Dowty. Messier-Bugatti-Dowty revised their maintenance procedure documentations. Airbus reminded users that corrosion protection was needed before plating was being applied.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Mar 1, 2010
Classification
Accident
Airline
ACT Airlines
Aircraft Type
Airbus A300
ICAO Type Designator
A30B
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Engineering the future: The intersection of technology and aviation education
Can you imagine a world without technology? What would have started as something that made life easier has grown to become something we can't live…
Behind the Scenes: Insights into Aircraft Ground Support Equipment
Have you ever wondered what happens when you disembark a plane? The roar of jet engines fades, the plane gracefully maneuvers to a stop, and the…
How to Write Admission Essays for Flight School
Pursuing a career in aviation is a path that demands dedication, perseverance, and an unwavering passion for defying gravity. As you embark on this…
AeroInside Monthly Aviation Safety Review March 2024
March 2024 was a busy month in aviation safety. Please find our summary below.All in all, 94 new articles have been published during last month. 13…
How Private Jet Travel Can Enhance Educational Opportunities
In today's interconnected and rapidly changing world, the landscape of education continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace. As the global village…
Newest articles
Fleet type match
Delta B763 at New York on Apr 26th 2024, emergency slide trouble
A Delta Airlines Boeing 767-300, registration N176DN performing flight DL-520 from New York JFK,NY to Los Angeles,CA (USA), was climbing out of JFK's…
Fleet type match
UPS B744 at Tokyo on May 6th 2023, hard touchdown on windshear recovery
A UPS United Parcel Service Boeing 747-400, registration N580UP performing flight 5X-109 from Shanghai Pudong (China) to Tokyo Narita (Japan), was on…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways