Jet Airways B773 over Turkey on Aug 8th 2014, loss of altitude
Last Update: December 28, 2015 / 14:31:14 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Aug 8, 2014
Classification
Report
Airline
Jet Airways
Flight number
9W-228
Departure
Mumbai, India
Destination
Brussels, Belgium
Aircraft Registration
VT-JEL
Aircraft Type
Boeing 777-300
ICAO Type Designator
B773
India's Directortate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) released their final report concluding the probable cause of the incident was:
The first officer inadvertently fed the Altitude window on Mode Control Panel with the corrected track of 292 Degree and activated thereby causing the altitude of the aircraft to drop.
The DGCA reported that the digital flight data recorder confirmed the aircraft was at FL340 with autopilot and autothrust engaged when the thrust levers were adjust back from about 58/59 degrees to about 50 degrees and the aircraft began to descend reaching a maximum vertical rate of descent of 1664 fpm. The aircraft climbed to FL320 about 3 minutes later.
The DGCA summarized testimony by the first officer: "The First Officer stated that the aircraft descended from FL340 without any pilot input until she arrested the descent AT FL317 using “ALT HOLD”. She became aware of the loss of altitude when she was queried by ATC. The Capt stated that he was taking controlled rest and was asleep at the time of the incident. He was woken up when the aircraft regained FL320."
The DGCA reported that the training records of the first officer showed no deficiency, all assessments after obtaining the type rating were satisfactory.
The DGCA analysed: "The aircraft was flying on westerly track which was between 230 and 300 degrees, the wind was approximately 240/45 kts. The Commander was under controlled rest during this period. While updating of heading 292 degree, in Turkish airspace the First Officer turned the altitude knob to 292 FL and pressed thereby causing the aircraft to descend. The Turkish ATC noticed the aircraft descent from FL340 to FL317. The ATC noticed the aircraft while descending below FL 320 and started calling about unauthorized descend. Subsequently, the First Officer pressed ALT HOLD and climbed back to FL320 Thereafter, the flight climbed to FL 320. The First Officer then woke up the Captain who was undergoing controlled rest. The commander saw 29200 feet on FMC when he woke up."
The DGCA summarized Analysis provided by Boeing:
Jet Airways provided the flight data, QAR data, and FMC BITE to M/s Boeing and asked to reproduce pilot input to MODE CONTROL PANEL at the relevant time based on the data.
M/s Boeing stated that - the FMC BITE analysis did not reveal anything that could be correlated with the reported un-commanded descent in cruise.
From the Boeing analysis report of the QAR and DFDR revealed that the following events took place:
“The airplane was flying level at FL340 (The MODE CONTROL PANEL altitude target window was also at FL340) with LNAV and VNAV mode engaged. At approximately 02:18:20 UTC, the MODE CONTROL PANEL Altitude was adjusted from FL340 to FL370, FL290 and then FL292 within 4 seconds. The QAR signal FMF_SEL_CRUISE_ALT signal shows a change from FL340 to FL292 approximately 10 seconds later, which indicates that the MODE CONTROL PANEL Altitude knob activated. The airplane responded per design, and began a cruise descent toward FL292. In addition, an EICAS ALTITUDE ALERT CAUTION was not present in the flight data. This annunciation would show if the aircraft descended more than 200 feet from FL340 (assuming that the MODE CONTROL PANEL Altitude remained at FL340). The data showed that the heading was 285 Magnetic (291 True) degrees at this time.
The airplane continued to descend from FL340 for approximately 1 minute and 45 seconds. When descending through FL318 the autopilot momentarily entered V/S (Vertical Speed) mode and then transitioned to the Autopilot ALT mode. This is consistent with the flight crew pressing the MODE CONTROL PANEL V/S button, then the ALT button. Approximately 2 seconds later, the MODE CONTROL PANEL altitude was adjusted from FL292 to FL320 but there was no MODE CONTROL PANEL Altitude knob press, so the FMF_SEL_CRUISE_ALT signal remained at FL292. The autopilot leveled at FL317. Approximately 35 seconds later, the MODE CONTROL PANEL altitude was changed from FL320 to FL340, but the MODE CONTROL PANEL Altitude knob was not activated. Approximately 10 seconds later, the VNAV mode was armed, and the AFCS immediately engaged in VNAV ALT mode at FL317, the target FMC altitude synched from FL340 to the current altitude of FL317, and the MODE CONTROL PANEL speed window closed.
Approximately 13 seconds later, the FMF_SEL_CRUISE_ALT signal rose from FL292 to FL340, consistent with the MODE CONTROL PANEL ALTITUDE knob being pressed. The airplane started to climb toward FL340. Upon climbing through FL320 the MODE CONTROL PANEL altitude knob was dialed down from FL340 to FL320 and the SEL button pressed, and the airplane then returned to level flight in the VNAV PTH mode. While the airplane was leveling it exceeded FL320 by 200ft and an altitude alert caution warned the pilots that the airplane had departed the MODE CONTROL PANEL altitude of FL320. The data showed that the flight continued normally thereafter.
This event does not appear to be similar to the condition reported in the FTD (Fleet Team Digest FTD Article 777-FTD-22-12001). In the past, MODE CONTROL PANEL window jumps have always been single jumps, and therefore only in one direction (increasing or decreasing, never jumping back and forth as in the subject event). Further, to date, there have been no window jumps followed by activation of the select knob.
Boeing is unable to identify an aircraft system failure that caused this descent. The available data does not the need to perform any additional aircraft maintenance in response to this event.”
The DGCA analysed that a simulator session was conducted to verify the events and stated: "The simulator findings and the DFDR analysis report submitted by Boeing are in concurrence with the observation made in the simulator exercise."
The DGCA concluded analysis: "During investigation it was also thought as to how this inadvertent flight level change or handling of control during the rest period could be addressed forthwith. The various flying pilots have stated that once the PIC is under controlled rest the first officer should desist from touching controls or effecting level change. Secondly, the cockpit being completely dark shall add to the fatigue at the end of flight. The PIC under controlled is akin to a situation as only one flight crew available in cockpit."
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Aug 8, 2014
Classification
Report
Airline
Jet Airways
Flight number
9W-228
Departure
Mumbai, India
Destination
Brussels, Belgium
Aircraft Registration
VT-JEL
Aircraft Type
Boeing 777-300
ICAO Type Designator
B773
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Jet Airways B773 at Amsterdam on Apr 21st 2017, tailstrike on departure
A Jet Airways Boeing 777-300, registration VT-JEW performing flight 9W-234 from Amsterdam (Netherlands) to Toronto,ON (Canada) with 343 passengers…
Jet Airways B738 enroute on Oct 14th 2011, unqualified pilot monitoring
A Jet Airways Boeing 737-800, registration VT-JGK performing flight 9W-481 from Mumbai to Chennai (India), had been dispatched with a captain (35,…
Jet Airways B738 at Riyadh on Aug 3rd 2018, rejected takeoff from taxiway results in taxiway excursion
A Jet Airways Boeing 737-800, registration VT-JFS performing flight 9W-523 from Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) to Mumbai (India) with 144 passengers and 7…
Jet Airways AT72 at Indore on Dec 6th 2018, engine fire
A Jet Airways Avions de Transport Regional ATR-72-212A, registration VT-JCN performing flight 9W-794 from Indore to Delhi (India), was climbing…
Jet Airways B738 at Goa on Dec 27th 2016, runway excursion during rejected takeoff
A Jet Airways Boeing 737-800, registration VT-JBG performing flight 9W-2374 from Goa to Mumbai (India) with 154 passengers and 7 crew, backtracked…
Newest articles
Red Air MD82 at Miami on Jun 21st 2022, runway excursion causes gear collapse on landing
A Red Air Dominicana McDonnell Douglas MD-82, registration HI1064 performing flight L5-203 from Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) to Miami,FL (USA)…
Southwest B737 near Dallas on Apr 25th 2024, engine shut down in flight
A Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-700, registration N793SA performing flight WN-4195 from Denver,CO to San Antonio,TX (USA), was enroute at FL410 about…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways