Frontier A321 at Las Vegas on Oct 5th 2024, fire at right main gear on landing

Last Update: October 28, 2024 / 20:29:15 GMT/Zulu time

Bookmark this article
Incident Facts

Date of incident
Oct 5, 2024

Classification
Incident

Flight number
F9-1326

Aircraft Registration
N701FR

Aircraft Type
Airbus A321

ICAO Type Designator
A321

A Frontier Airlines Airbus A321-200, registration N701FR performing flight F9-1326 from San Diego,CA to Las Vegas,NV (USA), landed on Las Vegas' runway 26L when large flames were seen from its right main gear. The aircraft stopped on the runway while emergency services responded and sprayed the right main gear with foam and water. There were no injuries.

The airline reported the crew smelled the smoke and declared Mayday immediately but it is unclear whether they were aware of the severity of the fire.

The FAA subsequently reported: "Frontier Airlines Flight 1326 made an emergency landing at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas, after reporting smoke in the cockpit. Fire & Rescue extinguished a fire on one of the engines and passengers were deplaned by the stairs. The Airbus 321 departed from San Diego International Airport. The incident occurred around 4:20 p.m. local time on Saturday Oct. 5. The FAA will investigate."

On Oct 6th 2024 the NTSB announced they have opened an investigation into the occurrence.

It became known later that the crew donned their oxygen masks during the descent towards Las Vegas due to the smell of smoke in the cockpit, subsequently the radar contact (Mode-S) was briefly lost and recovered, the crew was not able to transmit on radio but were hearing ATC instructions, the crew acknowledged ATC instructions or replied yes/no with ident.

On Oct 11th 2024 the NTSB reported the crew declared emergency due to smoke, the RAT deployed. On landing there was a fire in the main landing gear, four tires deflated, the aircraft came to a stop on the runway. The passengers disembarked via stairs. The occurrence was rated a serious incident and is being investigated.

The aircraft is still on the ground in Las Vegas about 3.5 hours after landing.

On Oct 28th 2024 the NTSB released their preliminary report summarizing the sequence of events:

According to the first officer, who was the pilot flying, while in cruise flight at flight level 290, just prior to the top of descent, the cabin crew advised the flight deck of an odor in the forward section of the airplane. The cabin crew described the odor as a chemical smell that was difficult to identify, and they were unable to determine its source. Shortly thereafter, the captain and first officer detected an odor in the cockpit, which they initially described as chemical and acrid in nature, or mildew-like. The flight crew stated the odor became increasingly pungent and evolved to smell like “burning rubber and/or petroleum products, such as plastics.”

The flight crew donned their oxygen masks, and the captain began the SMOKE/FUMES/AVNCS SMOKE checklist from the quick reference handbook (QRH). While following that checklist, the flight crew noted that there was no visible smoke in the cockpit and confirmed with the cabin crew that no smoke was visible in the cabin and that the odor persisted. At 1451, the first officer declared an emergency and requested a descent to LAS.

As they proceeded through the QRH checklist, the first officer noted that “aircraft systems began to degrade,” which included the unavailability of the autopilot and autothrottles. He recalled that it was unclear if the degradations were the “result of damage to equipment from a possible fire, or a result of systems isolations [specified] in the checklist[s].”

The captain recalled that the QRH advised to consider the electrical emergency configuration (ELEC EMER CONFIG) procedure if: 1) the smoke/fumes were the greatest threat, and/or if: 2) the source of the smoke/fumes could not be determined. Because he was unable to determine the source of the odor, the captain, confirming with the first officer, elected to perform the ELEC EMER CONFIG procedure. Both acknowledged that this procedure would deploy the ram air turbine. As a result, the display screens, radio, and transponder stopped functioning on the first officer’s side. The first officer transferred airplane control to the captain then transitioned the transponder to the no. 1 position (captain’s side). At 1501, as designed when ELEC EMER CONFIG is established, the flight data recorder lost power

With the radios active only on the captain’s side, the crew experienced some difficulty transmitting to air traffic control (ATC); thereafter, the first officer acknowledged ATC transmissions and instructions using the IDENT button on the No. 1 transponder.

The crew described their workload as high and the environment as increasingly hectic and stressful. The captain opted to focus on landing the airplane and relied on outside visual references during the approach. The first officer acknowledged ATC communications and instructions and confirmed/reiterated them with the captain, while calling out airspeeds, altitudes, and configuration information. During this time, the first officer noted that the captain’s primary flight display (PFD) had “limited data represented.” The captain recalled that they used the speeds placard on the instrument panel when configuring the airplane because the speed symbols on the PFD airspeed indicator were not present.

According to the captain, when the airplane was within about 1,000 ft above field elevation (AFE), it was “a little high for [the] stabilized approach criteria.” However, by 500 ft AFE, it was within the criteria, and the descent rate was no more than 900 feet per minute for the remainder of the approach. The captain recalled that the 50 ft [radio altitude] aural alert occurred as the airplane crossed the runway threshold.

At 1510, the airplane touched down on runway 26L. The captain moved the thrust levers to full reverse and applied braking. He recalled that after touchdown, the airplane “had no auto brakes and felt like no anti-skid.”

A witness located about 300 ft to the left of the airplane as it touched down reported hearing “two loud bangs in quick succession as the tires exploded about 3 seconds after touchdown. Then there was a large screen of smoke behind them and fire around the tires.”

The captain reported that during the rollout, he was looking outside to maintain the runway centerline and did not note the level of brake pressure that he was applying. The airplane eventually started to veer off the centerline as the airplane slowed.

Witness photographs and video recordings showed that shortly after touchdown, smoke began trailing behind both main landing gear before flames were visible from the same area. The flames appeared to extinguish shortly before the airplane came to a stop. Airport firefighting personnel and equipment arrived shortly thereafter and dispensed fire extinguishing agent around the landing gear and engines.

After the airplane stopped, the captain applied the parking brake and instructed the cabin occupants to remain seated. The first officer opened the cockpit side window to talk to first responders. The responders initially reported to the crew that there had been a no. 2 (right) engine fire, which had been extinguished. The flight crew recalled being surprised by this, as there had been no engine fire indications in the cockpit.

The flight crew reestablished radio communications with first responders and requested to evacuate the airplane on the runway. They began the emergency evacuation checklist but ultimately chose not to evacuate after the firefighting personnel assured them that the fire was extinguished and that the smoke was eliminated and no longer a threat. All passengers deplaned via stairs brought to the airplane.

The NTSB further annotated:

Data messages recovered from the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor system indicated that at 1449, a fault was detected in a fan unit that cools the avionics compartment. The unit was retained for further examination.

The flight data and cockpit voice recorder were sent to the National Transportation Safety Boards’s (NTSB) Vehicle Recorder Laboratory in Washington, DC. The flight data recorder captured most of the flight. However, it stopped recording about 9 minutes prior to touchdown due to a loss of electrical power when the ELEC EMER CONFIG was established. The cockpit voice recorder captured the entire flight.

According to the Quick Reference Handbook, when the airplane is in the ELEC EMER CONFIG condition, the wheel brake anti-skid, engine reversers, and nosewheel steering systems (among others) are inoperative, due to the limited electrical power available.

The SMOKE/FUMES/AVNCS SMOKE checklist includes a provision to restore electrical system capability prior to landing, to allow for the recovery of some or all of the inoperative systems.
Aircraft Registration Data
Registration mark
N701FR
Country of Registration
United States
Date of Registration
HicqeljAicddqflllm Subscribe to unlock
TCDS Ident. No.
Manufacturer
AIRBUS
Aircraft Model / Type
A321-211
Number of Seats
ICAO Aircraft Type
A321
Year of Manufacture
Serial Number
Aircraft Address / Mode S Code (HEX)
Engine Count
Engine Manufacturer
Engine Model
Engine Type
Pounds of Thrust
Main Owner
Ajphgmcfinjekleijhjeg nbckkg qcdbhiclhA phqbhpdhbqccinqecm edhkphqlbegbfphc nckmeAj gejdkj Subscribe to unlock
Incident Facts

Date of incident
Oct 5, 2024

Classification
Incident

Flight number
F9-1326

Aircraft Registration
N701FR

Aircraft Type
Airbus A321

ICAO Type Designator
A321

This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source

You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.

Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!

Are you a subscriber? Login
Subscribe

Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.

Send tip

Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.

Related articles

Newest articles

Subscribe today

Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.

Pick your plan and subscribe

Partner

Blockaviation logo

A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.

ELITE Logo

ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.

Blue Altitude Logo

Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.

AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320
Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American Airlines
United
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways