British Airways B789 and Qantas A332 at Sydney on Sep 28th 2022, loss of separation during standard instrument departure
Last Update: March 3, 2023 / 09:13:39 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Sep 28, 2022
Classification
Report
Airline
British Airways
Flight number
BA-16
Departure
Sydney, Australia
Destination
Singapore, Singapore
Aircraft Registration
G-ZBKF
Aircraft Type
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
ICAO Type Designator
B789
A Qantas Airbus A330-200, registration VH-EBK performing flight QF-926 from Sydney,NS to Cairns,QL (Australia), was also climbing out of Sydney's runway 16R following the DEENA7 SID having departed about 3 minutes after the B789 and about 6.3nm behind the B789.
As the A332 was lighter the aircraft crossed DEENA already at 6000 feet at DEENA while the B789 was still climbing at DEENA and initiated their turn only later thus permitting the A332 to "catch up". A loss of separation occurred, the distance between the aircraft reduced to 600 feet vertical and 2.4nm horizontal, the controller intervened and instructed the A332 to maintain 9000 feet and the B789 to expedite climbing through 10,000 feet.
Australia's ATSB reported the DEENA 7 SID is being revised as the procedure can not ensure separation due to the criteria set for turning.
The ATSB released their final report concluding the probable cause of the incident were:
Contributing factors
- When clearing two aircraft on the DEENA 7 standard instrument departure, the controller incorrectly assessed that they would have similar climb performance and became distracted and did not detect the relatively higher climb performance of the departing Airbus A330 aircraft. This resulted in the A330 turning inside the preceding Boeing 787 and a loss of separation standards with that aircraft.
- The DEENA 7 standard instrument departure has no designed positive separation assurance method, making it susceptible to loss of separation occurrences. (Safety issue)
The ATSB analysed:
During the departure of two heavy aircraft conducting the DEENA SEVEN standard instrument departure (SID), the controller assessed that the following Airbus A330 would have a similar climb performance to the leading Boeing 787, without considering that the A330 was conducting a domestic flight and would therefore have a significantly lower fuel load and better climb performance than the preceding heavily-loaded 787. The controller cleared both aircraft, in sequence, to climb to the same level. The controller then became distracted, planning the separation between 2 other aircraft and did not detect the variation in climb performance between the departing A330 and 787.
As the actual climb performance of the A330, on a domestic route, was greater than the climb performance of the 787 on an international route, the separation reduced. When the controller detected the closing aircraft, they instructed both flight crew to take action to increase the separation between their aircraft. During the occurrence, it is likely the controller did not receive a short-term conflict alert (STCA) warning however, they did suspect there had been loss of separation and did not provide a safety alert or advise that the instruction was an avoiding action.
The use of SIDs ‘enable the safe and efficient processing of instrument flight rules11 aircraft … from airports’ (Airservices Australia) and will ‘deconflict potentially conflicting traffic by the use of specific routings, levels, speed restrictions and check points’ (Skybrary). They are particularly useful in high traffic airspace such as departing Sydney Airport. However, according to Airservices Australia, SIDs do not provide longitudinal separation between aircraft which are following in trail with another aircraft, with controller action ensuring the maintenance of separation.
Despite this, the design of the DEENA SEVEN SID (and possibly others) did not provide a positive method of providing lateral separation assurance to departing aircraft with differing climb performance. As the aircraft had to satisfy 2 separate conditions prior to turning, there was no way of ensuring aircraft would turn at the same distance from the airport. As such, lateral separation could not be assured.
Airservices Australia advised that the DEENA SEVEN SID had been redesigned to remove the conditional requirements of the procedure. At the time of writing, the change had been approved and was planned to be released in the first implementation package for the Western Sydney International (Nancy-Bird Walton) Airport project. However, no timeframe for the release of the package was provided.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Sep 28, 2022
Classification
Report
Airline
British Airways
Flight number
BA-16
Departure
Sydney, Australia
Destination
Singapore, Singapore
Aircraft Registration
G-ZBKF
Aircraft Type
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
ICAO Type Designator
B789
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Fleet type match
British Airways B789 near London on Oct 1st 2020, passenger seat smoking
A British Airways Boeing 787-9, registration G-ZBKF performing flight BA-206 (dep Sep 30th) from Miami,FL (USA) to London Heathrow,EN (UK) with 53…
Fleet type match
British Airways B789 and Thai B773 at Delhi on Oct 7th 2017, simultaneous go around and takeoff result in loss of separation
A British Airways Boeing 787-9, registration G-ZBKF performing flight BA-143 from London Heathrow,EN (UK) to Delhi (India) with 216 passengers and 14…
Fleet type match
British Airways B789 near Brussels on Apr 29th 2017, loss of cabin pressure
A British Airways Boeing 787-900, registration G-ZBKF performing flight BA-143 from London Heathrow,EN (UK) to Delhi (India), was enroute at FL350…
Fleet type match
BAW B772 at London on Nov 24th 2023, electrical problems
A British Airways Boeing 777-200, registration G-YMMI performing flight BA-123 from London Heathrow,EN (UK) to Doha (Qatar), was climbing out of…
Fleet type match
BAW A35K over Atlantic on Oct 25th 2023, hydraulic problems
A BAW British Airways Airbus A350-1000, registration G-XWBH performing flight BA-219 from London Heathrow,EN (UK) to Denver,CO (USA), was enroute at…
Fleet type match
British Airways B789 near Anchorage on Oct 1st 2023, smoke in cabin, phone stuck in seat
A British Airways Boeing 787-9, registration G-ZBKN performing flight BA-8 from Tokyo Haneda (Japan) to London Heathrow,EN (UK), was enroute at FL370…
Fleet type match
British Airways A320 enroute on Oct 19th 2023, both pilots feeling ill after odour
A British Airways Airbus A320-200, registration G-EUUF performing flight BA-1321 from Newcastle,EN to London Heathrow,EN (UK), was enroute at FL270…
Fleet type match
British Airways A320 at Munich on Oct 12th 2023, fumes on board affect flight crew
A British Airways Airbus A320-200, registration G-EUUT performing flight BA-948 from London Heathrow,EN (UK) to Munich (Germany), was descending…
Newest articles
Lulutai SF34 at Vava'u and Nuku'alofa on Dec 8th 2023, hydraulic problem, gear problem, runway excursion and gear collapse
A Lulutai Saab 340B, registration A3-PUA performing flight L8-14 from Nuku'alofa to Vava'u (Tonga), was on approach to Vava'u when the crew decided…
American A319 at Fort Walton Beach on Dec 2nd 2023, passenger injured during go around
An American Airlines Airbus A319-100, registration N801AW performing flight AA-2872 from Dallas Ft. Worth,TX to Fort Walton Beach,FL (USA), was on…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways