Qantas B789 at Sydney on Jun 21st 2021, gear problem on departure
Last Update: November 16, 2021 / 11:30:33 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Jun 21, 2021
Classification
Incident
Airline
Qantas
Flight number
QF-645
Departure
Sydney, Australia
Destination
Perth, Australia
Aircraft Registration
VH-ZNH
Aircraft Type
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
ICAO Type Designator
B789
The flight was cancelled, the passengers were rebooked onto the next flight.
The ATSB reported during the climb the main gear did not retract and the crew received a gear disagree message. The post flight inspection revealed "that the forward gear pins on the left and right main landing gear were not removed prior to the flight." The ATSB rated the occurrence an incident and opened a short investigation that will include a review and examination of maintenance records beyond collecting other relevant evidence.
On Nov 16th 2021 the ATSB released their final report concluding the probable causes of the incident were:
Two of the five landing gear pins were not removed as per the operator’s procedures, nor identified by engineering, flight crew or dispatch during pre-departure checks. This resulted in the aircraft departing without the functionality to retract the main landing gear.
The ATSB analysed:
In this occurrence, multiple factors led to an aircraft departing configured such that the flight crew were unable to retract the main landing gear. Specifically:
- The tow crew used the visible streamers to identify what they incorrectly believed were the only three gear pins installed the aircraft.
- While the LAME was aware the 787 had five gear pins, they did not confirm all of them had been removed and stored before signing the tech log. Instead, the AME physically checked for the presence of pins without knowing the number to expect.
- The ladder used to access the gear pin stowage location was not of sufficient height to allow visual confirmation of pin stowage. Sighting of ‘empty’ pin stowage receptacles would have provided a clear indication that not all pins had been removed from the landing gear.
- The flight and dispatch crews conducted their external inspection with no expectation of finding streamers indicating gear pins were still installed. This was likely due to the tech log being endorsed and a belief that the gear pins had been removed by engineering personnel.
- There was probably reduced visibility of the streamers, due to their degraded condition and the likelihood they were stuck on the gear, from a combination of grime and the recent wet and windy conditions.
Research has demonstrated that people are more likely to detect targets (such as gear pin streamers) when they are expected and less likely to detect targets that are not expected (Wickens and McCarley 2008). In addition, bias can occur when prior knowledge, combined with an expected outcome, influences decision making.
The tow crew were expecting to see the gear pin streamers, as they had just completed moving the aircraft. The tow crew then identified, and removed, three main landing gear pins, which was consistent with the aircraft types they had experience on. In contrast, as the gear pins were typically removed prior to the flight and dispatch crew external inspections, they were not expecting to see any gear pin streamers.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Jun 21, 2021
Classification
Incident
Airline
Qantas
Flight number
QF-645
Departure
Sydney, Australia
Destination
Perth, Australia
Aircraft Registration
VH-ZNH
Aircraft Type
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
ICAO Type Designator
B789
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Qantas B789 over Pacific on Apr 14th 2024, electrical problem
A Qantas Boeing 787-9, registration VH-ZNH performing flight QF-76 (dep Apr 13th) from Vancouver,BC (Canada) to Sydney,NS (Australia), was enroute at…
Qantas A388 at Sydney on Jan 4th 2026, rejected takeoff
A Qantas Airbus A380-800, registration VH-OQB performing flight QF-1 from Sydney,NS (Australia) to Singapore (Singapore), was accelerating for…
Qantas A332 enroute on Dec 23rd 2025, pressurization problem
A Qantas Airbus A330-200, registration VH-EBA performing flight QF-36 from Singapore (Singapore) to Melbourne,VI (Australia) with 240 people on…
Qantas B738 near Auckland on Sep 26th 2025, cargo fire indication
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-VZE performing flight QF-141 from Sydney,NS (Australia) to Auckland (New Zealand), was descending towards…
Alliance E190 near Darwin on Sep 22nd 2025, loss of cabin pressure
An Alliance Airlines Embraer ERJ-190 on behalf of Qantas, registration VH-XVU performing flight QF-1889 from Darwin,NT to Cairns,QL (Australia), had…
Qantas A333 at Melbourne on Aug 10th 2025, hydraulic problems
A Qantas Airbus A330-300, registration VH-QPJ performing flight QF-29 from Melbourne,VI (Australia) to Hong Kong (China), was climbing out of…
Newest articles
Indigo A20N at Amritsar on Feb 5th 2023, engine shut down in flight
An Indigo Airbus A320-200N, registration VT-ISE performing flight 6E-5926 from Amritsar to Kolkata (India) with 122 passengers and 6 crew, was…
Hevilift AT42 at Simberi on Jan 15th 2026, runway excursion on landing
A Hevilift Avions de Transport Regional ATR-42-500, registration P2-KSA performing a charter flight from Port Moresby to Simberi (Papua New Guinea)…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
SafetyScan Pro provides streamlined access to thousands of aviation accident reports. Tailored for your safety management efforts. Book your demo today
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways