Malaysia B738 near Jambi on Feb 25th 2019, low fuel indication
Last Update: September 18, 2021 / 17:34:22 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Feb 25, 2019
Classification
Incident
Airline
Malaysia Airlines
Flight number
MH-724
Departure
Jakarta, Indonesia
Destination
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Aircraft Registration
9M-MXH
Aircraft Type
Boeing 737-800
ICAO Type Designator
B738
The aircraft remained on the ground for about 4 hours while repairs were made and continued to Kuala Lumpur landing there with a delay of about 5 hours.
In 2021 Malaysia's AAIB released their final report concluding the probable cause of the incident was:
The main cause of this incident was attributed to a technical fault of the Fuel Quantity Processor Unit (FQPU). The fault from the bad J1 connector and faulty clock signal from OSC1 was the cause for the unreliable fuel tank 1 quantity indication. It resulted in fuel configuration and imbalance on No. 1 tank light to illuminate.
This caused the fuel from left and right tanks to show a gradual increase in imbalance with fuel “IMBAL” and fuel “LOW” alerts triggered. The flight crew initiated a diversion due to suspected fuel leak caused by the misleading fuel indication.
The AAIB reported maintenance found no fuel leak.
The AAIB analysed:
Flight crew initially suspected a fuel leak due to fuel “IMBAL” alert triggered – where the fuel difference between main tank No.1 and main tank No.2 was more than 453 kgs. The flight crew did the “Non-Normal - fuel IMBAL” checklist which directed them to the “Non-Normal - FUEL LEAK ENGINE” checklist.
The “Non-Normal - FUEL LEAK ENGINE” checklist guided the pilot that there was no fuel leak. However, the fuel imbalance kept on increasing. The flight crew went through the “Additional Information” section of the checklist which gave guidance on reasons that an engine fuel leak should be suspected. As the total fuel quantity was decreasing at an abnormal rate and the fuel LOW alert showed, the flight crew suspected there was a fuel leak.
Diversion Decision to DJB
Due to the fuel leak, Captain mentioned that he wanted to land the aircraft down as soon as possible to avoid any controllability issues. Initially, the decision was the divert to SIN. However, Captain decided to divert to a nearer airport which was DJB, as advised by ATC.
The Operator's Operational Manual – A (OMA) indicated that adequate aerodrome shall have the applicable approach charts. The Operator does not have DJB approach charts in the aircraft as DJB is not listed as an adequate aerodrome for the Operator. Aircraft was already heading to DJB when the Copilot asked the Captain if they can divert to DJB without the approach charts. Captain convinced the Co-pilot that it was a safe decision.
Maintenance Action by Engineering & Maintenance
Initial inspection and troubleshooting carried out by GMF AeroAsia personnel at DJB, no evidence of fuel leak was observed at wing and engine area. Fuel quantity system test revealed that 28- 41108 COMPENSATOR unit having a bad data. A second test was performed, test pass. Water draining was carried out from the tanks. Nil sign of water contamination found in the fuel.
In KUL, MAB engineer carried out microbiological growth on the fuel tank as per AMM 28-10-00. Result was negligible, no further action required.
MAB engineer also carried out inspection on the fuel tank electrical bussing plug for any sign of corrosion or damages to the pin. Nil anomalies found. Fuel Tank wiring continuity and resistance check was performed as per FIM 28- 41 task 807. All continuity and resistance values are within limits. The bussing plug was cleaned prior installation.
Fuel Quantity Processor Unit (FQPU) was replaced for evaluation due nil
positive finding.
The tank No. 1 compensator was also replaced due intermittent bad data previously tested at DJB. Post installation test was satisfactory.
Spurious Unreliable Fuel Quantity Indication
The tank No. 1 indicated 630kg on landing, however, the fuel indication returned to normal after engine shut down. The tank No. 1 then indicated 2380kgs, which was the correct quantity in the tank.
Initial inspection carried out by GMF AeroAsia found no evidence of fuel leak around the wing and engine area. Initial test faulted the compensator. However, the second test carried out found nil anomalies.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Feb 25, 2019
Classification
Incident
Airline
Malaysia Airlines
Flight number
MH-724
Departure
Jakarta, Indonesia
Destination
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Aircraft Registration
9M-MXH
Aircraft Type
Boeing 737-800
ICAO Type Designator
B738
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Malaysia B738 at Jakarta on Jun 13th 2017, temporary runway excursion, burst tyre on landing
A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration 9M-MXH performing flight MH-725 from Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) to Jakarta (Indonesia) with 61…
Donavia B735 near Aktau on Apr 14th 2012, impatient stowaway
A Donavia Boeing 737-500, flight D9-4386 from Mineralnye Vody (Russia) to Tashkent (Uzbekistan), was enroute near Aktau (Kazakhstan) when a woman…
Malaysian B738 near Bangalore on Apr 15th 2012, weather radar failure
A Malaysian Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration 9M-MXH performing flight MH-193 from Bangalore (India) to Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) with 151…
Malaysia B738 near Kuala Lumpur on Mar 18th 2025, cargo smoke indication
A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration 9M-MXN performing flight MH-720 from Jakarta (Indonesia) to Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) with 115…
Malaysia B738 at Manila on Mar 14th 2025, engine problems
A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 737-800, registration 9M-MSB performing flight MH-705 from Manila (Philippines) to Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), was climbing…
Malaysia B772 over Gulf of Thailand on Mar 8th 2014, aircraft missing, data indicate flight MH-370 ended west of Australia, first MH-370 debris identified, search ended
On Dec 20th 2024 Malaysia's Ministry of Transport (MOT) stated in an interview, that the government accepted a proposal by Ocean Infinity in…
Malaysia A333 at Kuala Lumpur on Sep 1st 2024, hydraulic problems, transponder problems
A Malaysia Airlines Airbus A330-300, registration 9M-MTB performing flight MH-66 from Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) to Seoul (South Korea), was climbing…
Malaysian A333 near Alice Springs on Aug 19th 2024, engine problem
A Malaysian Airlines Airbus A330-300, registration 9M-MTJ performing flight MH-128 from Melbourne,VI (Australia) to Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), was…
Newest articles
Rouge A321 near Des Moines on Apr 16th 2025, odour on board
An Air Canada Rouge Airbus A321-200, registration C-FJQL performing flight RV-1702/AC-1702 from Las Vegas,NV (USA) to Toronto,ON (Canada) with 176…
United B789 over Philippines on Mar 27th 2025, turbulence causes 5 injuries
A United Boeing 787-9, registration N27958 performing flight UA-1 from San Francisco,CA (USA) to Singapore (Singapore) with 174 passengers and 14…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner

ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
SafetyScan Pro provides streamlined access to thousands of aviation accident reports. Tailored for your safety management efforts. Book your demo today
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways