Jetgo E135 at Melbourne on Oct 27th 2017, descended below safe height on approach
Last Update: December 19, 2018 / 15:14:21 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Oct 27, 2017
Classification
Report
Airline
Jetgo
Flight number
JG-44
Departure
Dubbo, Australia
Destination
Melbourne Essendon, Australia
Aircraft Registration
VH-ZJG
Aircraft Type
Embraer ERJ-135
ICAO Type Designator
E135
The ATSB released their final report concluding the probable causes of the incident were:
- During radar vectoring to runway 35 at Essendon, the aircraft descended through the radar lowest safe altitude (2,100 ft). The extent to which there was a problem with the functioning of the aircraft’s automatic flight control system could not be determined.
- Due to the captain (pilot monitoring) having difficulty sighting the runway, as well as perceived pressure to complete the flight, the first officer (pilot flying) focussed his attention outside the aircraft at a critical time during the descent.
- The flight crew did not detect that the aircraft had descended through the assigned level (2,100 ft) until the aircraft reached 1,600 ft.
The ATSB analysed:
During radar vectoring to runway 35 at Essendon Airport, the aircraft descended below the radar minimum safe altitude of 2,100 ft. The flight crew reported that the autopilot was engaged and the altitude of 2,100 ft was preselected at the time of the occurrence. A subsequent engineering inspection found no fault with the AFCS. Because no flight data was able to be obtained, the ATSB was unable to confirm what the AFCS mode(s) and settings were at the time of the occurrence, or the reason why the aircraft descended below the preselected altitude.
Regardless of the reason for the aircraft descending through the prescribed altitude, flight crew have a vital role in monitoring the aircraft’s flight path, particularly during descent. In this case, the first officer (pilot flying) relied upon automation to capture the assigned altitude and diverted his attention outside of the aircraft to assist the captain (pilot monitoring) in sighting the runway. As a result, neither pilot was monitoring the aircraft’s flight instruments or descent path as it approached and subsequently descended through the assigned level, which was also the minimum safe altitude.
The flight had been significantly delayed from its scheduled time of operation. The flight crew were aware of the reduced time margin for their scheduled return flight to depart Essendon prior to the 2300 curfew. In addition, neither pilot had operated at night into Essendon Airport, and the captain’s requested option of conducting an ILS approach to runway 26 had been declined by ATC due to traffic. The captain’s subsequent difficulty in identifying runway 35 at night, the delayed arrival of the aircraft at Essendon and the proximity of the curfew time probably contributed to the first officer (pilot flying) focussing his attention outside the aircraft at a critical time of flight.
Both flight crew had the previous days off duty and had a reasonable amount of sleep the night before. Although both flight crew had been awake for 15−16 hours at the time of the occurrence, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that they were operating at a level of fatigue known to influence performance at the time of the occurrence. Nevertheless, they would probably have been operating at an elevated risk of fatigue during the subsequent two flights.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Oct 27, 2017
Classification
Report
Airline
Jetgo
Flight number
JG-44
Departure
Dubbo, Australia
Destination
Melbourne Essendon, Australia
Aircraft Registration
VH-ZJG
Aircraft Type
Embraer ERJ-135
ICAO Type Designator
E135
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Fleet type match
Jetgo E135 at Middlemount on Aug 8th 2017, collided with runway threshold lights
A Jetgo Embraer ERJ-135, registration VH-JGB performing charter flight JG-23 from Brisbane,QL to Middlemount,QL (Australia) with 23 passengers and 3…
Jetgo E135 at Tamworth on Aug 28th 2016, takeoff without runway lights
A Jetgo Embraer ERJ-135, registration VH-JTG performing flight JG-65 from Tamworth,NS to Brisbane,QL (Australia), was taxiing for departure at night…
Newest articles
Fleet type match
TUIfly B738 at Heraklion on Oct 7th 2024, unusual runway contact
A TUIfly Boeing 737-800, registration D-ATUF performing flight X3-4106 from Hanover (Germany) to Heraklion (Greece), landed on Heraklion's runway 27…
Fleet type match
Sunexpress B38M at Izmir on Oct 4th 2024, jammed elevator
A Sunexpress Boeing 737-8 MAX, registration TC-SMD performing flight XQ-9282 from Izmir to Diyarbakir (Turkey), was climbing out of Izmir's runway…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways