Qantas B744 at Hong Kong on Oct 5th 2016, engine pylon cracks detected
Last Update: June 6, 2018 / 16:31:58 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Oct 5, 2016
Classification
Report
Airline
Qantas
Aircraft Registration
VH-OJT
Aircraft Type
Boeing 747-400
ICAO Type Designator
B744
The ATSB released their final report concluding:
- The fatigue cracking in four outboard strut ribs in the No. 2 engine pylon is likely to have developed from exposure to vibratory loading within the pylon during normal engine operation over the aircraft’s service life.
- The extent of fatigue cracking in the ribs did not affect the structural integrity of the pylon for all certified load cases, which meant that the aircraft’s safe operation was not affected.
The ATSB reported the aircraft had been involved in a rejected takeoff on Jun 24th 2016 following the failure of the low pressure turbine of the #2 engine, which resulted in a high speed seizure of the engine causing siginficant vibration and torque loads to the pylon. The aircraft was attempting to depart for flight QF-27 from Sydney,NS (Australia) to Santiago (Chile).
However, the ATSB analysed: "Metallurgical analysis of the fracture at the crack origins did not show any evidence of plastic deformation or tearing of the alloy that might otherwise suggest that the seizure was a contributing factor to the cracking." (Editorial note: the ATSB had not investigated the rejected takeoff, the rejected takeoff also remained unknown to the AVH until now).
The ATSB reported:
Boeing’s ongoing maintenance requirements included an inspection of the engine pylon every 48 months. A general visual inspection within the torque box for corrosion damage was required along with a more detailed inspection for cracking of the ribs. The procedures noted that during the inspection, particular attention should be applied to the cutaway where stringers passed through each rib.
Qantas reported to the ATSB that several years prior to this occurrence, it had independently increased the frequency of the zonal inspections from 48 to 24 months due to repeated instances of corrosion and cracking damage within the pylon region. That new inspection interval was formalised by Qantas within its maintenance documentation for its 747 fleet.
The ATSB analysed:
When compared with the 48-month inspection interval recommended by the manufacturer, the 24-month inspection interval set by Qantas provided greater opportunity for the timely detection of cracking and other defects within the pylon. The reduced inspection interval proved effective in this case, detecting cracks before they reached a level considered by the manufacturer to be a safety risk.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Oct 5, 2016
Classification
Report
Airline
Qantas
Aircraft Registration
VH-OJT
Aircraft Type
Boeing 747-400
ICAO Type Designator
B744
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Fleet type match
Qantas B744 near Honolulu on Jan 13th 2016, odour on board
A Qantas Boeing 747-400, registration VH-OJT performing flight QF-15 from Brisbane,QL (Australia) to Los Angeles,CA (USA), was enroute at FL290 about…
Fleet type match
Qantas B744 near Bangkok on Jan 25th 2011, engine consumed too much fuel
A Qantas Boeing 747-400, registration VH-OJT performing flight QF-2 from Bangkok (Thailand) to Sydney,NS (Australia) with 325 passengers, was about…
Fleet type match
Qantas B738 at Sydney on Nov 8th 2024, engine failure on departure sets grass alight
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-VYH performing flight QF-520 from Sydney,NS to Brisbane,QL (Australia) with 175 passengers, 6 crew and dry…
Fleet type match
Qantas B738 near Rockhampton on Apr 18th 2026, cargo smoke indication
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-VXT performing flight QF-705 from Cairns,QL to Melbourne,VI (Australia), was enroute at FL370 about 240nm…
Fleet type match
Qantas B738 enroute on Apr 10th 2026, fumes on board
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-VZC performing flight QF-857 from Canberra,AC to Perth,WA (Australia), was enroute at FL380 about 500nm west…
Fleet type match
Qantas A388 at Sydney on Jan 4th 2026, rejected takeoff
A Qantas Airbus A380-800, registration VH-OQB performing flight QF-1 from Sydney,NS (Australia) to Singapore (Singapore), was accelerating for…
Fleet type match
Qantas A332 enroute on Dec 23rd 2025, pressurization problem
A Qantas Airbus A330-200, registration VH-EBA performing flight QF-36 from Singapore (Singapore) to Melbourne,VI (Australia) with 240 people on…
Newest articles
Fleet type match
Cathay Pacific B773 at Hong Kong on May 11th 2026, engine vibrations
A Cathay Pacific Boeing 777-300, registration B-KPD performing flight CX-253 from Hong Kong (China) to London Heathrow,EN (UK), was climbing out of…
Fleet type match
Easyjet A319 at London on May 14th 2026, lightning strike
An Easyjet Airbus A319-100, registration G-EZDH performing flight U2-8305 from London Gatwick,EN (UK) to Milan Malpensa (Italy), was climbing out of…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
SafetyScan Pro provides streamlined access to thousands of aviation accident reports. Tailored for your safety management efforts. Book your demo today
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways