Qantas B744 at Hong Kong on Oct 5th 2016, engine pylon cracks detected
Last Update: June 6, 2018 / 16:31:58 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Oct 5, 2016
Classification
Report
Airline
Qantas
Aircraft Registration
VH-OJT
Aircraft Type
Boeing 747-400
ICAO Type Designator
B744
The ATSB released their final report concluding:
- The fatigue cracking in four outboard strut ribs in the No. 2 engine pylon is likely to have developed from exposure to vibratory loading within the pylon during normal engine operation over the aircraft’s service life.
- The extent of fatigue cracking in the ribs did not affect the structural integrity of the pylon for all certified load cases, which meant that the aircraft’s safe operation was not affected.
The ATSB reported the aircraft had been involved in a rejected takeoff on Jun 24th 2016 following the failure of the low pressure turbine of the #2 engine, which resulted in a high speed seizure of the engine causing siginficant vibration and torque loads to the pylon. The aircraft was attempting to depart for flight QF-27 from Sydney,NS (Australia) to Santiago (Chile).
However, the ATSB analysed: "Metallurgical analysis of the fracture at the crack origins did not show any evidence of plastic deformation or tearing of the alloy that might otherwise suggest that the seizure was a contributing factor to the cracking." (Editorial note: the ATSB had not investigated the rejected takeoff, the rejected takeoff also remained unknown to the AVH until now).
The ATSB reported:
Boeing’s ongoing maintenance requirements included an inspection of the engine pylon every 48 months. A general visual inspection within the torque box for corrosion damage was required along with a more detailed inspection for cracking of the ribs. The procedures noted that during the inspection, particular attention should be applied to the cutaway where stringers passed through each rib.
Qantas reported to the ATSB that several years prior to this occurrence, it had independently increased the frequency of the zonal inspections from 48 to 24 months due to repeated instances of corrosion and cracking damage within the pylon region. That new inspection interval was formalised by Qantas within its maintenance documentation for its 747 fleet.
The ATSB analysed:
When compared with the 48-month inspection interval recommended by the manufacturer, the 24-month inspection interval set by Qantas provided greater opportunity for the timely detection of cracking and other defects within the pylon. The reduced inspection interval proved effective in this case, detecting cracks before they reached a level considered by the manufacturer to be a safety risk.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Oct 5, 2016
Classification
Report
Airline
Qantas
Aircraft Registration
VH-OJT
Aircraft Type
Boeing 747-400
ICAO Type Designator
B744
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Qantas B744 near Honolulu on Jan 13th 2016, odour on board
A Qantas Boeing 747-400, registration VH-OJT performing flight QF-15 from Brisbane,QL (Australia) to Los Angeles,CA (USA), was enroute at FL290 about…
Qantas B744 near Bangkok on Jan 25th 2011, engine consumed too much fuel
A Qantas Boeing 747-400, registration VH-OJT performing flight QF-2 from Bangkok (Thailand) to Sydney,NS (Australia) with 325 passengers, was about…
Qantas B789 over Pacific on Apr 14th 2024, electrical problem
A Qantas Boeing 787-9, registration VH-ZNH performing flight QF-76 (dep Apr 13th) from Vancouver,BC (Canada) to Sydney,NS (Australia), was enroute at…
Qantas A332 at Perth on Mar 25th 2024, engine shut down in flight
A Qantas Airbus A330-200, registration VH-EBA performing flight QF-781 from Melbourne,VI to Perth,WA (Australia), was descending towards Perth when a…
Qantas B738 near Kalgoorlie on Oct 25th 2021, fuel imbalance and engine shut down in flight
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-VZT performing flight QF-888 from Perth,WA to Adelaide,SA (Australia) with 88 passengers and 6 crew, was…
Qantas B738 and Qantas B738 at Sydney on Apr 29th 2023, loss of separation between go around and takeoff
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-VZW performing flight QF-146 from Auckland (New Zealand) to Sydney,NS (Australia) with 100 passengers and 7…
Qantas B738 over Tasman Sea on Oct 19th 2023, radio failure
A Qantas Boeing 737-800, registration VH-XZF performing flight QF-142 from Auckland (New Zealand) to Sydney,NS (Australia), was enroute at FL360 over…
Newest articles
UPS B744 at Tokyo on May 6th 2023, hard touchdown on windshear recovery
A UPS United Parcel Service Boeing 747-400, registration N580UP performing flight 5X-109 from Shanghai Pudong (China) to Tokyo Narita (Japan), was on…
Delta B763 at New York on Apr 26th 2024, emergency slide trouble
A Delta Airlines Boeing 767-300, registration N176DN performing flight DL-520 from New York JFK,NY to Los Angeles,CA (USA), was climbing out of JFK's…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways