Nordic Regional E190 near Turku on Dec 3rd 2017, smell of smoke in cabin
Last Update: November 28, 2018 / 18:50:52 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Dec 3, 2017
Classification
Incident
Airline
Nordic Regional Airlines
Flight number
AY-865
Departure
Helsinki, Finland
Destination
Gothenburg, Sweden
Aircraft Registration
OH-LKE
Aircraft Type
Embraer ERJ-190
ICAO Type Designator
E190
A passenger reported there was smell of smoke intensifying as if there was a small fire on board. The aircraft diverted to Turku, the passengers went down the inflatable slides and were taken to the terminal.
The airline confirmed smell of smoke in the cabin prompted the diversion to Turku and emergency evacuation. There were no injuries. Arrangements are being made to take the passengers to Gothenburg.
Finland's Onnettomuustutkintakeskus (SIAF) opened a safety investigation into the occurrence reporting there was smoke in the cabin. In the afternoon of Dec 4th 2017 the SIAF added, that the source of the smoke was identified in the malfunctioning air conditioning system.
On Nov 28th 2018 the SIAF released their final report concluding the probable causes of the occurrence were:
1. The rotating assemblies – i.e., the cooling fan, compressor and both turbines – of an ACM contacted the fan shroud as a result of the failure of journal bearings.
Conclusion: The ACM failure generated smoke.
2. A cabin crew member notified the flight crew of smoke and a possible fire. The flight crew also smelt smoke. A warning of the ACM failure was only received after smoke had appeared. The occupants also felt pressure fluctuations. Warnings related to the crew oxygen system appeared and a message indicating an automatic pressurization control anomaly displayed.
Conclusion: Smoke and a possible fire are extremely serious inflight occurrences and necessitate landing at the nearest suitable airfield. Simultaneous failure indications increased the flight crew's workload.
3. A cabin crew member was unable to open the protective bag of a PBE. Tests showed that a pull of approximately 25 kp would have been needed. The task would have been easier had the bag been modified according to the manufacturer's service bulletin.
Conclusion: The modification is non-mandatory, but non-compliance may preclude the use of a PBE in an emergency. A crew member must be able to extract and don a PBE easily and expeditiously since it will be crucial to the maintenance of the wearer's functional capability in the presence of smoke and fire.
4. The passengers were transported from the movement area to the evacuation point in two city buses that were requisitioned on a fire chief's initiative pursuant to the provisions of the Rescue Act.
Conclusion: Turku aerodrome had in place no plans for the use of local buses, and the same applies to most of Finavia’s other airports. Under certain weather conditions the moving of the passengers from the accident site without undue delay will be essential.
5. The captain notified area control of a fire on board the airplane and declared emergency. Area control relayed the information to Turku ATC, which in turn alerted the ERC to respond to a full emergency situation.
Conclusion: The alerting instructions guide an ATC controller to classify an inflight fire as a full emergency situation. Pursuant to the instructions, the Southwestern Finland ERC, among other agencies, will not order the region’s hospitals to elevate readiness when a full emergency is reported.
6. The flaps were selected “up” already during the landing roll.
Conclusion: The flaps will more likely be found extended during an evacuation if the post-landing procedures are initiated only after the speed has reduced to the taxiing speed. This will reduce the drop height from the wing walkway by approximately 0.5 m.
The SAIF reported the crew noticed fluctuations in the cabin pressure after takeoff, noticeable by both pressure indications and feel in the ears. The crew continued the flight increasing monitoring of the cabin pressure and decided to level off at FL310 as a precaution. Intermittent low pressure warnings for the crew oxygen system occurred, then an advisory of a pressurization problem occurred, which however did not require a flight crew action. Soon after a burning odour developed on board which the crew initially believed to have originated from an oven in the forward galley. The smell intensified prompting the crew to return to Helsinki. After the crew had initiated the return and had turned around cabin crew reported there was smoke in the cabin and something was burning. The captain thus declared Mayday, reported a fire on board, soon after a PACK 1 FAIL message occurred. Smoke entered the cockpit, the flight crew donned their oxygen masks and decided to divert to Turku. One of the cabin crew tried to open her protective breathing equipment but was unable to open the protective bag. The aircraft landed on Turku's runway 26 and vacated the runway. Cabin crew notified the cockpit that the smoke had intensified prompting the captain to initiate an emergency evacuation.
The SAIF concluded the narrative of the sequence of events: "The passengers exited the airplane via door slides and overwing exits. Those who left the cabin via the overwing exits did not get off the wings down to the ground. Since climbing from the wings involved a risk of injury, and smoke was no longer observed inside the airplane, the rescue crews prompted these passengers to return to the cabin and exit via the slides. The rescue crews examined the airplane for signs of fire and found none. The passengers were taken in buses and rescue vehicles to the aerodrome maintenance unit facility where they were accounted for and their condition was assessed."
There were no serious injuries, the #1 Air Cycle Machine (ACM) showed damage. An overwing exit door also showed minor damage and hat caused a dent in the wing upper skin. A sensor in the crew oxygen system was found defective (unrelated to the ACM fault).
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Dec 3, 2017
Classification
Incident
Airline
Nordic Regional Airlines
Flight number
AY-865
Departure
Helsinki, Finland
Destination
Gothenburg, Sweden
Aircraft Registration
OH-LKE
Aircraft Type
Embraer ERJ-190
ICAO Type Designator
E190
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
Finnair E190 near Ekaterinburg on Jun 1st 2012, cabin did not pressurize
A Finnair Embraer ERJ-190, registration OH-LKE performing flight AY-152 from Ekaterinburg (Russia) to Helsinki (Finland) with 86 people on board, was…
Nordic Regional E190 at Helsinki on Aug 12th 2018, lightning strike
A Nordic Regional Airlines Embraer ERJ-190 on behalf of Finnair, registration OH-LKL performing flight AY-315 from Helsinki to Vaasa (Finland) with…
Nordic AT72 near Helsinki on Apr 7th 2017, gear problem after departure
A Nordic Regional Airlines Avions de Transport Regional ATR-72-212A on behalf of Finnair, registration OH-ATO performing flight AY-203 from Helsinki…
Newest articles
Luxwing DH8D at Guernsey on Apr 23rd 2024, runway overrun on landing
A Luxwing de Havilland Dash 8-400 on behalf of Aurigny Air Services, registration 9H-LWB performing flight GR-609 from London Gatwick,EN to…
British Airways A388 at Singapore on Apr 22nd 2024, weather radar failure
A British Airways Airbus A380-800, registration G-XLED performing flight BA-12 from Singapore (Singapore) to London Heathrow,EN (UK), was climbing…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways