TAM A319 near Rio de Janeiro on Jun 17th 2011, airborne contact with hot air balloon causes unreliable speeds
Last Update: October 1, 2013 / 20:22:01 GMT/Zulu time
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Jun 17, 2011
Classification
Report
Airline
TAM Linhas Aereas
Flight number
JJ-3756
Departure
Rio de Janeiro Santos Dumont, Brazil
Destination
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Aircraft Registration
PT-MZC
Aircraft Type
Airbus A319
ICAO Type Designator
A319
Brazil's CENtro de Investigacao e Prevencao de Acidentes aeronauticos (CENIPA) released their final report in Portugese reporting, that as result of impact with the banner all three dynamic ports of the pitot system as well as a TAT probe were obstructed. CENIPA concluded the probable causes of the serious incident were:
The collision of the balloon with the aircraft was the main factor to the occurrence of the serious incident, which resulted in the discrepancy and inaccuracy of basic flight parameters and in the degradation of the automatic systems.
Contributing factors were:
There was inadequate management of duties of each crew member to the extent that actions were not requested, performed or completed although required by standard operating procedures like defined by task sharing by the manufacturer, the ECAM actions and checklist items.
Both pilots triggered their sidesticks simultaneously creating a dual input, when the crew spotted the balloon so close that insufficient time remained to avoid the balloon. It was not possible to determine whether the pilot actions contributed to the collision.
The investigation could not decide whether the crew continued the flight into RVSM airspace, onto a RNAV approach and onto an ILS approach without required systems being available because of forgetfulness or ignorance.
The training programme of the operator had not completed training of unreliable airspeed and ADR check procedures in all phases of flight and did not cover all items recommended by the aircraft manufacturer, with respect to frequency of simulator training it is possible that there was lack of familiarity with the tables used in emergencies.
CENIPA reported that the captain (9,163 hours total, 3,074 hours on type) was pilot flying, the first officer (5,951 hours total, 2,651 hours on type) was pilot monitoring. During departure from Santos Dumont the captain demonstrated the "update function" of the inertial system on the progress page of the FMGS, while following the departure route PORTO-6. Suddenly both crew spotted the balloon and both reacted triggering their sidesticks in order to avoid a frontal collision with the balloon, the banner however hit the aircraft and obstructed all three dynamic ports of the pitot system as well as a TAT probe. CENIPA analysed that due to the demonstration of the FMGS the attention of both crew member was diverted inside the aircraft causing reduced monitoring of the exterior. Hence the crew detected a balloon on their trajectory late prompting both crew members to move their sidesticks, causing a "dual input" message, in order to take an evasive maneouver, which however could no longer prevent contact with the balloon.
CENIPA continued analysis stating that as result of the banner having obstructed all dynamic ports and a TAT probe all automatic systems were degradated causing the autopilot and autothrust to disconnect, the flight controls change to alternate mode, the standby speed indicator becoming inoperative. All these messages and events would have required to run the relevant checklists, however, the captain did not assign task sharing and did not request the first officer to perform the related ECAM actions. Instead the crew attempted to reset the flight director and autopilot to no avail.
The analysis continued saying that the captain instructed the first officer to disregard the "NAV ADR DISAGREE" message, which however would be the most important tool to detect discrepancies in indicated air speed and suspect unreliable airspeed. The captain finally instructed the checklist unreliable airspeed but interrupted the execution of the checklist when he identified ADR3 as inoperative and changed some switches to select another source. In doing so the commander executed a task that he as pilot flying and monitoring the first officer running the checklist should not have executed. After executing memory items several items of the checklists were omitted including to inform air traffic control and check the accuracy of airspeed and altitude as well as other indications off the air data reference units. The crew thus still could not determine whether ADR1 or ADR2 were providing reliable data. The unreliable air data reference units should have been shut down.
Although the aircraft had lost systems mandatory for operating in RVSM airspace as well as mandatory to perform the arrival route and ILS approach the crew did not report the occurrence to air traffic control or advise of the inability to perform the procedures. As result numerous alarms like altitude and heading deviations occurred in cruise flight, the aircraft went more than a nautical mile off the approach track.
CENIPA continued analysis stating that the weather was extremely favourable to deal with the emergency by providing visual meteorologic conditions throughout the flight, which also helped to compensate for the unfamiliarity of the first officer with the pitch/power tables.
The lack of familiarity with the scenario, the lack of familiarity with the pitch/power tables, the lack of task sharing and monitoring, the lack of coordination with air traffic control, the lack of compliance with checklists as well as low situational awareness have all aggravated the situation. An annual simulator training in compliance with the aircraft manufacturer's recommendations could have resulted in a different performance by the crew.
The release of balloons create a risk of collision with aircraft as the trajectory of unmanned balloons can not be controlled and may enter areas of intense air traffic. Although balloons are generally objects of low intensity, the high speed and energy of aircraft pose the danger of a catastrophic outcome. Even though the collision with a balloon has been (partly) considered in aircraft design, the impact of the fire source or accessories of the balloon with the aircraft's engines or gear may create a fire hazard, cause engine failures and take out air data reference systems. In this case a balloon of 10kg caused an impact force of 2.26 tons, a balloon of 50kg an impact force of 100 tons due to the aircraft moving at more than 250 KIAS. The balloon caused all air data references to be obstructed and could have caused a catastrophic outcome to 101 occupants of the aircraft.
In general there have been 143 sightings of balloons by aircrews in 2012, several of which required partly extreme evasive maneouvers to prevent a collision. The balloons such pose a significant danger to Brazilian Aviation.
Incident Facts
Date of incident
Jun 17, 2011
Classification
Report
Airline
TAM Linhas Aereas
Flight number
JJ-3756
Departure
Rio de Janeiro Santos Dumont, Brazil
Destination
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Aircraft Registration
PT-MZC
Aircraft Type
Airbus A319
ICAO Type Designator
A319
This article is published under license from Avherald.com. © of text by Avherald.com.
Article source
You can read 2 more free articles without a subscription.
Subscribe now and continue reading without any limits!
Read unlimited articles and receive our daily update briefing. Gain better insights into what is happening in commercial aviation safety.
Send tip
Support AeroInside by sending a small tip amount.
Related articles
TAM A320 near Rio de Janeiro on Feb 28th 2014, loss of cabin pressure
A TAM Linhas Aereas Airbus A320-200, registration PT-MZX performing flight JJ-3193 from Salvador,BA to Rio de Janeiro Galeao,RJ (Brazil) with 149…
TAM A320 at Brasilia on Apr 8th 2015, touched down before runway during go around
A TAM Linhas Aereas Airbus A320-200, registration PR-MHV performing flight JJ-3451 from Recife,PE to Brasilia,DF (Brazil) with 154 passengers and 6…
TAM A332 over Atlantic on Sep 2nd 2013, turbulence injures 15
A TAM Linhas Aereas Airbus A330-200, registration PT-MVL performing flight JJ-8065 (dep Sep 1st) from Madrid,SP (Spain) to Sao Paulo Guarulhos,SP…
TAM A321 at Sao Paulo on May 20th 2016, bird strike
A TAM Linhas Aereas Airbus A321-200, registration PT-XPQ performing flight JJ-3548 from Sao Paulo Guarulhos,SP to Recife,PE (Brazil), was climbing…
TAM A321 at Sao Paulo on Apr 26th 2016, bird strike
A TAM Linhas Linhas Aereas Airbus A321-200, registration PT-XPJ performing flight JJ-3289 from Sao Paulo Guarulhos,SP to Porto Alegre,RS (Brazil)…
Newest articles
Zimex AT72 at Dublin on Feb 22nd 2024, runway incursion
A Zimex Aviation Avions de Transport Regional ATR-72-200, registration HB-ALQ performing flight XM-359 from Dublin (Ireland) to Maastricht…
Yeti AT72 at Pokhara on Jan 15th 2023, lost height on final approach, both propellers went into feather
On Mar 28th 2024 Nepal's Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission (AAIC) released their final report via the French BEA concluding the probable…
Subscribe today
Are you researching aviation incidents? Get access to AeroInside Insights, unlimited read access and receive the daily newsletter.
Pick your plan and subscribePartner
A new way to document and demonstrate airworthiness compliance and aircraft value. Find out more.
ELITE Simulation Solutions is a leading global provider of Flight Simulation Training Devices, IFR training software as well as flight controls and related services. Find out more.
Your regulation partner, specialists in aviation safety and compliance; providing training, auditing, and consultancy services. Find out more.
AeroInside Blog
Popular aircraft
Airbus A320Boeing 737-800
Boeing 737-800 MAX
Popular airlines
American AirlinesUnited
Delta
Air Canada
Lufthansa
British Airways